Monday, June 26, 2017

Is that "cute" animal picture a depiction of abuse?

Behind the chimp-proof glass is former entertainment chimp Kendall (now in a social group at the North Carolina Zoo)

Cute animal pictures are the best part of social media.  But as a primatologist, there's also "cute" pictures that make me cringe. Every birthday there's at least one picture posted to my wall of an entertainment chimp fear-grimacing. And frequently, I have to be the killjoy explaining to someone why the picture or video they're sharing is problematic.

This happens too often. Today, the picture drawing my ire was an entertainment chimp illustrating a news story on the Science magazine website (though they quickly changed it when we raised concerns on Twitter- thanks @NewsfromScience for being responsive!). 

No one wants to be the killjoy ruining the fun. But if you understand the context behind the picture, it stops being a cute picture, and becomes a disturbing depiction of abuse and suffering. 

Several studies demonstrate that pictures of primates increase the belief that they are desirable as pets, or aren't endangered. And viral videos can increase demand for the illegal pet trade. 

So how do you tell the difference? Sometimes it's hard, but other times it's very simple. These guidelines are focused on primates, but apply to many wild animals as well.

1) Does the picture depict a primate dressed in human clothes, wearing makeup, playing with phones, or otherwise depicting unnatural behavior?

DON'T SHARE. These are tell-tale signs that the animal is in the entertainment industry, or a pet. In both these situations, animals are taken from their mothers at an early age, deprived of typical socialization, and often abused and mistreated. Occasionally there are exceptions (photoshop or monkeys grabbing phones from tourists), but these pictures can promote the idea that they are desirable pets.

2) Is the primate in an unnatural-looking setting?

PROCEED WITH CAUTION. Sometimes these are pictures of pets, or animals housed in a roadside zoo or pseudo-sanctuary. However, in other cases it might be animals in an unnatural-looking but enriching enclosure at an accredited zoo. For example, the bonobos at the Columbus Zoo have a very unnatural looking indoor enclosure, but they have a lot of fun climbing structures and varied enrichment.

Juvenile bonobo at the Columbus Zoo (where the enclosure is unnatural but enriching!)

3) Does the picture show an unnatural pairing (for example, a monkey and dog pair) that probably doesn't occur in the wild?

PROCEED WITH CAUTION. Some of these pictures may be unlikely friendships that occur in the wild, or in humane captive environments (such as zoos or accredited sanctuaries). However, exploitative roadside zoos and pseudo-sanctuaries put unlikely pairings together because it generates attention. See if you can figure out where it was taken before you share.

4) Does the picture depict a "wild" primate sitting on someone's shoulders?

DON'T SHARE. And more importantly, don't put yourself in this situation! These may be wild animals that are fed to encourage tourist interaction, or they may be captured animals that are abused and displayed for tourists. It's dangerous for both the animals and, and the humans, because primates can cause serious injuries and diseases can easily be transmitted between humans and primates (and Herpes B, which causes benign cold sores in macaques, is lethal to humans). 

5) Is the picture a gorilla splashing around in a giant kiddie pool at an accredited zoo?

SHARE AWAY! Provided it is a picture from an accredited zoo (context is everything), this is one of those situations in which the unnnatural setting provides a captive animal with a lot of fun enrichment!

Still have questions? That's okay, there's often a lot of gray area or lack of context. If you're not sure, but think it MIGHT be exploitative... err on the side on the side of caution and avoid the "share" button. And if you're not sure, feel free to ask a primatologist (if you tweet me @MARspidermonkey, I"ll give you my assessment)!

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

10 Reasons Spider Monkeys could be the #2017MMM Champions

Most of the winners of March Mammal Madness tend to be large-bodied, terrestrial mammals, so it might be easy to overlook a twenty-pound, arboreal frugivore. But don't let their small size, endangered status*, or predominantly vegetarian** diet fool you! They are fierce competitors!

So, here are 10 reasons why spider monkeys are awesome and have a real shot at being the #2017MMM champions.

Adult Female Margarita at Brookfield Zoo.

1. They are smarty-pants! They are highly encephalized, with very large brains for their body size

2. We've observed them using tools, and they have a number of social traditions.

3. They have self-control. On inhibition tasks, they perform comparably to chimpanzees and orangutans (and better than capuchins and macaques)!

4. They are speedy and FLY through the trees. I'm pretty sure that they only way I was able to follow spider monkeys is that they let me tag along.

5. They are ferocious killers. Seriously. Male coalitions engage in territorial raids and lethal aggression, and there are observations of infanticide as well.

6. Their prehensile tail assists in semi-brachiation, but can also be used as an extra hand. I used to know a captive spider monkey who would use her tail to check my pockets for hidden snacks. Their tail even has "fingerprints" (aka, dermatoglyphics) to help them grip!

Look at that those tail "fingerprints!"

7. Although they are highly arboreal and dependent on tropical forest, they can travel on the ground. When males engage in raids, they walk silently, single-file on the ground (just the way chimpanzees do on raids)!

8. Although there is limited evidence for this, reports from a re-introduced population in Barro Colorado Island suggest that they may swim short distances between islands!

9. They tend to be lefties, just like me! In humans, unexpected left-handeness can provide a strategic advantage in sports and competition.

10. They are so darn cute. Yes, I know that MMM is about combat, not a #cuteoff, but since animals use a variety of tactics to win these battles, surely charming the opposition is a legitimate strategy?

Infant male Judah (ca 2010). Isn't he the cutest?!

*Most Ateles species are endangered, but they range from vulnerable to critically endangered.
**Spider monkeys are predominantly frugivores, but in addition to fruit they do eat leaves, flowers, and insects. Most of the insects they consume, like fig wasps, are within the fruit they eat.

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Resistance is Never Futile

Saturday, we made history, and it was one of the most amazing days of my life.

The train downtown

I saw the pictures on social media of women on planes, on trains, in buses, and at rest stops, all traveling to DC. When I waited with friends to take the train in Chicago, we watched our already-filled train speed past us, and boarded a second train, which quickly filled up. It was like the march was began right on the platform into Union Station. The city was alive with a stream of signs and hats, and men and women pouring through the loop to get to Grant Park.

At the Rally

During the rally, we were far enough that we couldn't see or hear anything actually going on for the rally. We stood, and chatted, and took pictures and admired signs.We watched the helicopters swirling above. I speculated about how someday, when the kids of the future learn history from virtual reality holodecks, they might be stepping into our pictures and video and virtually marching with us.

" We all move forward when we recognize how RESILIENT and STRIKING the women around us are. "--Rupi Kaur

We had no idea what was going on, and no one around us could get a connection to access social media on phones. After the "march" was supposed to happen, some people cutting through the crowd said there were tweets saying the march was cancelled. But eventually the crowd started to move, the marshalls told us to turn around, we followed the crowd, and we marched.

The giant IUD was one of my favorite "signs"

We marched, and we chanted. "This is what democracy looks like," "Our bodies, our choice/Her body, her choice," "Black lives matter," "We're here, we're queer, we're fabulous." The atmosphere felt positive, energetic, inclusive, intersectional. There were certainly a whole lot of white ladies, but there were women of different races and ethnicities, men, and range of sexualities and identities. There were babies, and older kids, and plenty of grandmothers. There were signs in Spanish and Arabic. It was an amazing and unforgettable experience.

My run buddies double as march buddies

And then when I went home and caught up with social media, I saw my friends posting from cities all over the US. I saw pictures and video of marches from different cities, different states, and different countries. We marched in every state! There was a tiny town in Idaho, where half of the town's 63 residents came out to march! We marched all around the world, on every continent! Even some penguins turned out!


I hope we can hold on to that momentum and the motivation, because things are getting scary FAST. The current administration is doubling down on outright lies, cracking down on scientific research and communication, and going forward with the Dakota Access Pipeline. In just four days, there's been a terrifying move to suppress facts, suppress science, and endanger womens' rights, indigenous rights, and the environment.

We still have more work do on building a intersectional movement. But as we do that, we need to continue to keep resisting. There is so much that is frightening and overwhelming, and I'm not quite sure how to cope with it. But we need to keep up the calls, the e-mails, the protests, and reminding everyone we know that this is not normal.

Facts are verifiable. Science is real. We are entering a fascist, authoritarian rule and this is not normal. Resistance is never futile, and we have to keep at it. Let's keep on holding onto those truths.

Here are a few of the resources I've been drawing on to keep up with action items.

Action Checklist for Americans of Conscience

Action for a Better Tomorrow (IL)

It's Time to Fight

Indivisible Guide

Women's March 10 actions/100 days

I'm going to keep scrolling through the amazing footage of the marches, and singing this song when I need motivation.

Sunday, January 8, 2017

Science, Politics, and Remaining Sane in a Dystopian Wonderland

Right now, we're at a risk of entering a stage in US politics where the administration is explicitly anti-science, and anti-education. At this point, debates about whether or not scientists should engage in political activism are largely irrelevant, because science, education, and pretty much everything anthropologists do will be under attack.

The issue I struggle with is figuring out how to stay motivated, engaged, and actually make a difference. It's hard to stay sane when we're experience nationwide gaslighting. Since November 9, I've felt like we collectively fell down a rabbit hole and emerged in a ugly dystopian Wonderland where up is down and nothing makes sense anymore. As someone who values facts, evidence, and reason, it's a struggle to remind myself that I am still sane, when it seems like the world around us has decided to dispense with facts and reason.

But despite that, WE CAN'T GIVE UP. Nearly everything I care about is under threat, and we  have to fight to protect it. Here some of the ways of the Trumperdink* administration threatens the work I do:

*Many thanks to Cary Elwes for the appropriate nickname
  • Under a Trumperdink administration, environmental protections will be dismantled, climate research will defunded and banned (and climate scientists may face persecution), and destructive resource extraction will increase. This will intensify the rate of global warming and ongoing mass extinction--and that's going to determinentally effect spider monkeys and bonobos and all the other primates I love.
  • Under a Trumperdink administration, public education, both at the K-12 and universities levels, are going to be under assault. Betsey DeVos is anti-public education, and anti-teaching evolution. Teaching evolution is going to be under assault, so biology teachers, biologists, and anthropologists are going to face more obstacles to our teaching and our research.
  • Women, ethnic and religious minorities, gay, transgendered, and disabled people are already facing increased risks of harassment and violence. As a women of color, I'm increasingly scared for my own safety. Since my newest research project is looking at stress and resilience in female scientists of color, this is obviously going to have an impact on our research participants, and they research itself.
  • The biggest sources of scientific funding come from the government (NSF, NIH, NASA), and in an explicitly anti-science political climate, they are going to face even more cuts. 
  • Public universities have been facing systematic budget cuts because states refuse to adequately fund them. The combination of lack funding sources, and lack of resources to hire teaching faculty, means the job market for scientists and academics is going to get even worse. It's already been difficult and grim. Right now, my future is very uncertain. And I fear the jobs in science and academia will dry up entirely, and staying in science will require competing for the few international jobs available. 
Add that to the fact that I am terribly afraid that we are heading down a dark road may lead to erosion of  our rights, and potentially genocide or nuclear war. I am afraid, it's been hard to focus on my work, and I feel divided between my desire to stay informed and remain politically active, and my need to stay sane and preserve my emotional energy for the upcoming years.

One of my biggest fears is that I'll give in to hopelessness and apathy, and that will pave the way for much worse. My biggest fear, beyond the fear of mass deportations, internment camps, genocide, or nuclear war, is that when it comes down to standing up for other people's rights, and protecting myself, is that I will choose the cowardly option. 

So for now, I'm going to focus on preventing us from reaching that point. I'm going to join the people who are standing up, speaking out, and mobilizing to protect us. I've been calling my representatives again and again, and we saw last week that this works. I'm starting to become involved in local grassroots political activism, and need to learn more about government at the local level. The past semester, in the 21st Century Scientists working group, we've been talking a lot about how to communicate science across political and tribal identities. I'm still struggling with finds ways to put this into practice, but a common theme we've been discussing is the importance of storytelling and establishing common emotional ground. I hope I can find ways to adequately put this into practice. 

Another way that I've finding hope and establishing sanity is reading quality journalism (like Teen Vogue!), and occasionally detaching from social media to read fiction.  I've been processing the current political situation is to think about so many of my favorite books, both fiction and non-fiction, that dealt with individuals facing oppressive regimes. 

Here are few really important pieces I've read online. I suggest that if you haven't, you should book mark some of these to read, and re-read, to keep yourself sane and motivated.
I've heard so many friends say that they're losing hope, or that they are coping with the political situation by disengaging with news and social media. Please stay engaged, and stay hopeful. Here's one reason to stay hopeful: the 115th Congress is the most diverse we have ever had. We still have a long way to go, but let's do our work to support them.

The women representing us (Shared from Rep. Cheri Bustos on Twitter)

Saturday, September 3, 2016

Chimpstravaganza and Primatepalooza

Last week and the previous weekend, I was at the biggest gathering of primatologists EVER. It was mostly very fun, and very amazing. And very tiring.

This was my first conference in which I live-tweeted, which was a lot of fun! I also got to meet some of my "twitter friends." Whale biologist Shane Gero (who presented in a symposium on the convergence of whales and primates) put together a pretty cool sociogram of the IPS/ASP twitter network.

Shane Gero's awesome sociogram--I'm pretty central!

At Chimps in Context, I presented an e-poster, Socio-behavioral Convergence of Female Affliative Behaviors in Pan and Ateles. Frans de Waal liked it, so I think it was a success :)

 Thanks to Alex Georgiev for taking the pic!

At the IPS/ASP meetings, I had a podium presentation on Grooming Networks in Captive Chimpanzees and Bonobos.

Thanks to my co-author Emily Boeving for taking the pic!

Here are some of my big take-aways from both meetings:
  • Spider monkeys and bonobos are my true loves
  • Comparative research between species yields the most interesting findings (which is why I keep moving on to different species!)
  • Female bonobos reach puberty WAY earlier than female chimpanzees, and immigrate earlier, but reproduce at the same age--what's going on?
  • Geoffroy's spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) have joined the Top 25 most endangered primates, and this breaks my heart :(
  • There's a site where female spider monkeys form linear dominance hierarchies, which is CRAZY! It's likely due to habitat degradation that is forcing them into more contest competition
  • Several spider monkey researchers (including myself), are highlighting the amazing convergence between  spider monkeys (Ateles) and chimps/bonobos (Pan)--but we really need to get the chimp and bonobo researchers on board!
  • Chimp research is still largely dominated by a few East African chimp sites--which is a shame because there are some great central and western chimpanzees sites (including Fongoli)!
  • Researchers studying other primates are frustrated with constantly being told that they should be studying chimps or that their research is less important/interesting/meaningful/relevant because it's not chimpanzees
  • This is particularly annoying because from my past interview experiences, if you want to study chimpanzees after studying other primates, it's seriously questioned why you are interested in them/if you are sufficiently qualified to study chimpanzees
  • live-tweeting can really run your phone battery down--so it's a good idea to bring your charger, and tweet selectively!
  • I had lots of close encounters with Jane Goodall, but when I was introduced to her I said "hi," shook her hand... and silence. I could have told her what I study, or asked for a picture, instead... awkward silence, Ooops.
  • My major fangirl moment was seeing Karen Strier talking to Jane Goodall! 
  • Several friends mentioned really horrible field experiences--no one really talked about them in detail, but it's a lot more common than I'd thought. 
  • My tattoo is gorgeous, and Stephen Nash is proud that I'm the second person to get a tattoo of his artwork... but it was not a strong contender in the tattoo contest. I just can't compete with the full-color ones! 
  • Primatologists have very mixed results when you tell them you are studying humans
  • There's still a lot of disagreement on the ethics of keeping primates in laboratory settings, welfare in captive settings across the board, and the retirement of lab primates to sanctuaries--and it's a VERY tense subject
  • The job market for primatologists REALLY sucks--and while it's bad for all of us swimming in a small, dried-up pool, it's also very concerning for the endangered primates who really need us
  • While primatology is a female-dominated discipline, seeveral friends and I had a few experiences that reminded us that it sexism is still an issue in our discipline
  • 10 days of conferencing is an endurance event, and there are a ton of talks/sessions I wanted to go do, but food, sleep, socializing, and recharging (my brain, my phone, and my laptop) won out.
  • IPS 2018 is in Nairobi, Kenya, and IPS 2020 is in Quito, Ecuador! Since I've been dying to go to South America for pretty much forever, I'm hoping to head to Quito in four years.
  • As great it is to talk about and learn about primates, it's always fun to ditch out on part of a conference to watch primates.
Macaques at Lincoln Park Zoo during Chimps in Context

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Identity Matters in Science

 In April, I went down to Chambana (U of Illinois, my alma mater and the location for my new postdoc) for the 21st Century Working Scientists meeting. The meeting was about engaging in science communication, public outreach, and broadening participation in science. Danielle Lee was the keynote speaker and spoke about bringing your identity into outreach. We all set goals for what we wanted to accomplish in our scientific communication, and the ways that we wanted to approach it. Danielle's approach to blogging (and scientific communication in general) was the opposite of mine. She was all about bringing her whole identity to blogging. That means stating exactly who she is, and what she thinks, and how that affects her science. The reason I stopped blogging a few years ago was because I was afraid to do that. I was overly-anxious about how others may perceive me based on my writing, particularly search committees. For a two-year period, I averaged about an interview a month, so I knew that they would probably be googling me and reading anything I put out on the internet. It strait-jacketed my ability to write at all. I worried that if I wrote about captive animal welfare, or my feelings about using primates in biomedical research, or the challenges of being a woman of color in science, that it could detrimentally affect my career prospects.

My perspective on this has changed. I used to think that if I highlighted my research background and focus on the science, that's all that mattered. But I've learned that it doesn't work that way. We don't conduct or disseminate our research in a vacuum, and we can't leave the sociocultural context at the door. It follows into classrooms and labs and field sites. It shapes the opportunities we get, the way our colleagues treat us, and the social and intellectual environment in which we try to do research, writing, and outreach.

Many of the events in the past month have made it hard to focus on research, writing and science. How do you focus on your work when social media is constantly blowing up with the latest tragedy? In the past month, we've seen the deadliest mass shooting targeting LGBTQA, predominantly Latinx individuals. With Trump's campaign egging on hatred and xenophobia, and anti-Islamic sentiment, Muslims and Sikhs are facing increased risks for hate crimes and racial profiling in the US. After the Brexit vote, hate crimes are surging in the UK as well. Meanwhile, in Turkey, Bangaladesh, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia, there's been a spate of attacks, some of which target either holy sites or Muslims celebrating Eid. While it's clear that ISIS is targeting devout, observant Muslims, many Americans are still equating Muslims (and Sikhs, and anyone that looks brownish or Middle Eastern or South Asian) with terrorism. And in the past two days we watched the murders of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile streaming across social media. These murders are just two in a long list of police violence against black people. And then at the ensuing protests at Dallas, there was another deadly shooting targeting the police officers at the event. And it continues...I'm scared to hear about what might be next.

I'm tempted to block out all media, hide out, and try to focus on my writing goals for this summer. But that's hard to do. It's hard to live in country where there are so many ordinary citizens owning guns and harboring hatred for anyone who is an "other." It's hard to live in a country where the police target, harass, and murder for people for being black or brown. It's hard to sign into Facebook and see some of my friends liking hateful, racists memes. It's hard to live in country where the Republican presidential nominee is outrightly encouraging xenophobic and misogynistic hate toward pretty much anyone who isn't white (or Christian, or straight, or male).

In this social and political climate, it's hard to be an "other." I'm not part of a heavily targeted group, so I have it easier than many others (in case you were wondering, I'm Indian, Catholic, and my last name is Portuguese). But I've certainly encountered my share of microaggressions, some of which are based on either my actual identity, or what people perceive me to be (people usually assume I'm Latina, but occasionally I've also been mistaken for a variety of other ethnicities). My last international conference experience (to Canada, a place that I thought was racially progressive compared to the US!) was definitely marred by the "flying while brown" treatment. In the past year I've become increasingly anxious as xenophobic sentiment has increased in the US. It really hit home for me when a Sikh man was brutally attacked while driving in my community, just down the road from where my childhood church and high school.

It's hard to not feel anxious when this sort of violence is a reality. In the wake of the shootings of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile, Danielle wrote that she is Too Traumatized to Science, and I'm going to add to that. In a social and political climate where minorities and "others" live in a state of fear and anxiety, it takes a psychological toll. If want the culture of scientific research to actually be "inclusive" and "diverse" we need to recognize that, and make space to deal with it. As a whole, we need to acknowledge that black lives matter, that brown lives matter, that gay lives matter, and that when social and political issues affect some of us, it affect all of us.

I'm back in Chambana now, working with a girls science camp. We've been discussing with them the ways in which identity influences the scientific process, and how diverse perspectives result in better bioengineering. I'm glad that they are learning this lesson now--it's one that I think all of us would have benefited from a bit earlier in our scientific training.

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

What can we learn from Harambe's death?

Images of Harambe from the Gladys Porter Zoo 

Over the past few days, several people have asked me for my opinion on Harambe's death. Was his behavior aggressive? How much of a danger did he pose to little Isaiah? Could they have rescued Isaiah without shooting Harambe? Is it cruel and/or dangerous to keep apes in zoos?*

I've waited to respond to these questions in detail, because my full response is longer than I want to devote a Facebook comment, and I wanted some time to reflect. My initial response, like many, was to blame the parents for being inattentive, and to question if the zoo staff could have tried harder to find an alternate way to safely retrieve Isaiah. 

On reflection, I think it's a mistake to blame either the parents OR zoo staff. Yes, the parents should have kept a closer eye on their child. But almost every parent has had a moment when their kid slipped away. And the amount of hatred and vitriol directed specifically at the mother--not the father, who was also present--is disturbing (see Barbara King's NPR column for some perspective on this). I suspect that the harsh criticism and public shaming of the mother is partially rooted in both sexism and racism.

Some blame the zoo for not designing a secure, child-proof enclosure, but I also think that this is a bit unfair. Yes, every zoo enclosure SHOULD keep animals safely in, and human visitors safely out. But it passed previous inspections, and has been safe from human intrusion for decades. Unfortunately, no exhibit is completely human- or animal-proof, and often we don't recognize the flaws in barriers UNTIL a wily human or animal finds it. 

As much as I wish that the zoo staff could have found a way to safely retrieve Isaiah without harming Harambe, I know they followed their protocol and made a decision that prioritized human safety. I don't think that human lives are intrinsically more valuable than gorilla lives. Both are important and meaningful to me. But for obvious ethical and legal reasons, zoos are obligated to prioritize the safety of humans above the lives of the animals. Zoos have trained response teams whose job is to evaluate situations in which an animal is endangering humans, and make these split-second decisions. The keepers tried calling in the gorillas--the females in the group went in, but Harambe did not. Tranquilizers are almost never a viable option in these situations, because they will likely result in a more agitated animal who could behave unpredictably.  

I've seen a lot of different interpretations of Harambe's behavior from primatologists I respect--some state that Harambe's actions were aggressive display behavior, others interpret it as protective or playful behavior (I recommend reading/listening/viewing the perspectives from Frans de Waal, Craig Stanford, Scott Suarez, Barbara King, Ian Redmond, and Amy Parish). From the video clips I've seen, I can see both--Harambe stands protectively over Isaiah, and seems to be holding his hand and shielding his body at a couple points. But at other points he drags Isaiah around, and that looks like a display. It's possibly he was displaying, it's possibly he was dragging Isaiah around to protect him--but either way, human children are fragile, and Isaiah's life was in danger. I think it's possible that keeper staff might have been able to eventually calm and distract Harambe--but waiting to do so meant risking greater harm to Isaiah.

Can we learn from this?

Unfortunately, neither hindsight nor assigning blame will bring Harambe back. So instead, I think it's more productive to think about ways we can learn from it, and if there's anything positive that can come from it. I do find it encouraging that so many people care about Harambe, and hope this can be a learning opportunity for the public.

1. When visiting zoos we need to be mindful and respectful of the animals.

One thing that is striking in the video of Harambe and Isaiah is that it's clear the visitor noise and commotion is agitating Harambe, and contributing to the escalation of his display behavior. While, hopefully, none of us will be in this situation in the future, I've seen this play out in much more subtle ways while observing zoo animals. When zoo visitors see aggression, displays, or agitated animals, they react loudly. Sometimes particularly obnoxious humans will  elicit or exacerbate the situate by banging on exhibit glass, or making threatening motions and gestures. Many primates are threatened by intense staring (which is often perceived as a challenge), open-mouthed facial expressions (which is a threat behavior), and large, expansive gestures (which look like displays). Try to avoid making these sort of unintentional threat behaviors. If your kids are doing so, take them away from the exhibit and have them run off their energy at one of the zoo playgrounds instead. 

2. Keep a close eye on your children at the zoo, and read and obey posted signs.

Obviously no one intends to lose their kid, but often I have seen people keep less than a watchful eye on their kids at the zoo. Additionally, a lot of adults disregard signs that are posted for the sake of both the animals well-being and human safety. One summer when I was observing rhino behavior for a zoo welfare project, I saw some of the interesting reactions people had when thye read a sign that said that the rhino may spray urine. Some read the sign and immediately avoided the whole area. Others laughed and moved in closer--even when the rhino was backing up and lifting his tail (a sure sign that spraying was about to occur). 

3. If you care of the lives of gorillas, contribute to conservation efforts. 

All gorillas species and subspecies are endangered or critically endangered in the wild (see the IUCN red list). Their major threats are humans poaching (primarily for bushmeat, but babies often end up in the pet trade), Ebola, mining, and logging. Both hunting and disease transmission are facilitated by logging. Logging concessions establish roads and logging camps, which increase contact with humans, as well as provide infrastructure to bring bushmeat to urban markets. Furthermore, coltan mining similarly threatens gorillas in Central Africa. While we may believe we have little to do with these threats, it's our behavior within the global market that drive these activities. 

What You Can Do To Conserve Gorillas

4. Avoid sharing pictures/video of humans interacting with primates or other wild animals.

It may seem cute and harmless, but you are are contributing to industries of exploitation. This includes both the illegal pet trade, as well as individuals and organizations that keep animals in cruel and abusive situations for entertainment. Furthermore, it gives people (both adults and children), the idea that interacting with wild animals can be safe or fun. Kids are particularly impressionable, and if they see pictures/video of people playing with wild animals, of course they are going to want to do it to (I highly recommend reading  Please Do not Hug the Dangerous Wildlife  and watching Is Social Media Saving or Enslaving the Slow Loris for more information about this).

5. Remember Harambe with respect and dignity.

Gorillas are intelligent animals with complex emotions and social relationships, and I'm certain he will be missed and mourned by both his gorilla family and the humans who cared for him. My heart breaks for his keepers, and the female gorillas Mara and Chewie. Silverback gorillas are the center of gorillas social groups, and it will probably be difficult for Mara and Chewie to adjust to Harambe's absence. Silverback must protect their groups from takeovers from bachelor groups, as well as threats from human poachers. While we can't be certain of his intentions when interacting with Isaiah, I suspect that his actions were rooted in protecting his group.

* I believe it is ethical to keep great apes in zoos, and am confident that AZA-accredited zoos prioritize animal welfare. However, I've avoided addressing this subject here, because that delving into that topic requires it's own post.